A 47-year-old woman was diagnosed with right-sided triple-negative breast cancer. Staging showed localised disease. She underwent a modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Pathology: T2N1, triple-negative, an aggressive subtype that usually needs comprehensive therapy. She received adjuvant chemotherapy (8 cycles), followed by radiation to the right chest wall and supraclavicular fossa: 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks. She then moved into follow-up.
Nine months later: a faint spark on the scan
On routine PET-CT, a single, isolated hotspot appeared in the right internal mammary node (IMN)—with no disease elsewhere. A gut-punch moment, but also a clearly defined target.
Tumour board huddle: the smartest next step
The case went to the multidisciplinary tumour board. Local options considered: surgery vs radiation. Surgery wasn’t chosen, so the team planned high-precision re-irradiation to the IMN. Because she’d been irradiated just months earlier, safety demanded meticulous planning.
The previous 3D-CRT tangential plan was imported and fused with the new planning CT. The radiation oncologist and physicist reviewed the dose already delivered at the IMN site and the cumulative exposure to organs at risk (OARs). Prescription: 40 Gy in 15 fractions to the recurrent IMN, delivered with IG-IMRT (image-guided, intensity-modulated radiotherapy) for millimetre-level accuracy and daily image verification.
In plain English: we overlaid the old radiation “footprints” onto the new map so we could hit the recurrence precisely without overdosing nearby normal tissues.
How she did
She tolerated treatment well with no acute morbidity. Daily image guidance kept the target centred and protected normal tissues.
The result that matters
At 3 months post-IMN radiation, PET-CT showed a complete metabolic response—the hotspot was gone, and no other disease was seen. She remains disease-free on follow-up at 10 months (and counting).
Breast cancer isn’t one disease; triple-negative can be fierce. Yet even after previous radiation, a well-selected, precisely planned second course can be feasible and effective when recurrence is localised and the team rigorously accounts for cumulative dose. With timely scans, clear tumour-board decisions, and precision tech, a setback can become a second victory.